Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.28 seconds)

State Of Andhra Pradesh And Ors.Etc vs Mcdowell & Co.And Ors.Etc on 21 March, 1996

In Dilip Kumar & Company and Others (supra), the Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court had examined the correctness of the decision rendered in the case of Sun Export Corporation, Bombay v. Collector of Customs, Bombay, reported in (1997) 6 SCC 564, on a reference being made. The question that had arisen for consideration was as to what is the interpretative rule to be applied while interpreting a tax exemption provision/notification when there is an ambiguity as to its applicability with reference to the entitlement of the assessee or the rate of tax to be applied? In that context, the Hon'ble Supreme Court had answered the reference holding that an exemption notification should be interpreted strictly, and the burden of proving applicability would be on the assessee to show that his case comes within the parameters of the exemption clause or exemption notification. When there is ambiguity in exemption notification which is subject to strict interpretation, the benefit of such ambiguity cannot be claimed by the subject/assessee and it must be interpreted in favour of the revenue.
Supreme Court of India Cites 60 - Cited by 491 - B P Reddy - Full Document

U.P.Power Corporation Ltd. & Anr vs Sant Steels & Alloys (P) Ltd & Ors on 10 December, 2007

In Pawan Alloys & Castings (P) Ltd. (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme 46 Court observed that when no public interest was sought to be pressed in service by the Board for withdrawal of the incentive rebate, and the same was solely on the ground of commercial interest of the Board which had earlier held out a promise of incentive rebate, the equity which had arisen in favour of the appellants remained untouched and undisturbed by any overwhelming and superior equity in favour of the Board entitling it to withdraw the incentive rebate in a premature manner leaving the promisees high and dry.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 61 - A K Mathur - Full Document
1