Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.30 seconds)
Hyprecision Hydraulik vs State Of Maharashtra And 3 Ors on 21 December, 2022 cites

Commnr. Of Central Excise, New Delhi vs M/S. Hari Chand Shri Gopal & Ors on 18 November, 2010

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi Vs. Hari Chand Shri Gopal and Ors.4 iv. State of Maharashtra Vs. Shri Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal and Ors. 5 v. Essar Steel India Limited & Anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and Anr. 6 vi. ONGC Commission of India Vs. MCGM7 Submissions of Mr. Raichandani in Rejoinder 2 (2022) 5 SCC 62 3 (2005) 1 SCC 368 4 (2011) 1 SCC 236 5 (2022) 2 SCC 725 6 (2017) 8 SCC 357 7 (2017) SCC Online Bom 9206
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 282 - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra vs Shri Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal on 7 January, 2022

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi Vs. Hari Chand Shri Gopal and Ors.4 iv. State of Maharashtra Vs. Shri Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal and Ors. 5 v. Essar Steel India Limited & Anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and Anr. 6 vi. ONGC Commission of India Vs. MCGM7 Submissions of Mr. Raichandani in Rejoinder 2 (2022) 5 SCC 62 3 (2005) 1 SCC 368 4 (2011) 1 SCC 236 5 (2022) 2 SCC 725 6 (2017) 8 SCC 357 7 (2017) SCC Online Bom 9206
Supreme Court of India Cites 39 - Cited by 11 - M R Shah - Full Document

Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilisers ... vs Deputy Commissioner Of Commercial ... on 2 August, 1991

(Emphasis supplied) He submitted that from the enunciation of law laid down in the case of Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. (supra), there would be no doubt that the Shubham Muley 12/29 13 Writ Petition No.1573 of 2019.doc Petitioner was eligible to the refund of octroi and wad denied entitlement of the same on the venial and technical grounds. He submitted that such denial to a benefit to which a person/entity was otherwise eligible was totally unjust.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 270 - S C Agrawal - Full Document

Oil & Natural Gas Commission Of India vs Municipal Corporation Of Greater ... on 22 February, 2002

We find that even the judgment of this Hon'ble Court in the case of Oil and Natural Gas Commission of India Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & Ors. 8 upon which heavy reliance was placed since the same dealt with Section 194 of the MMC Act is of no assistance to the Respondents as the facts in the said case are entirely different from the facts in the present case. In the case of ONGC the issue involved pertained to the powers of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay to levy octroi on natural gas that was being imported by the Petitioner in that case (ONGC) within the Municipal limits of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay. In the facts of that case Section 139 of the MMC Act specifically conferred powers upon the Municipal Corporation to impose four different types of taxes including octroi in terms of Entry 22(a) of Schedule-H. Entry 22(a) of Schedule-H reads as under:
Bombay High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 16 - D B Bhosale - Full Document

Essar Steel India Ltd. And Anr vs State Of Gujarat And Anr on 2 May, 2017

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi Vs. Hari Chand Shri Gopal and Ors.4 iv. State of Maharashtra Vs. Shri Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal and Ors. 5 v. Essar Steel India Limited & Anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and Anr. 6 vi. ONGC Commission of India Vs. MCGM7 Submissions of Mr. Raichandani in Rejoinder 2 (2022) 5 SCC 62 3 (2005) 1 SCC 368 4 (2011) 1 SCC 236 5 (2022) 2 SCC 725 6 (2017) 8 SCC 357 7 (2017) SCC Online Bom 9206
Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 6 - A Bhushan - Full Document
1