Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.19 seconds)
Anubha vs Krishan Kant on 14 August, 2012 cites

Jayant Bhargava vs Priya Bhargava on 1 April, 2011

41 In Jayant Bhargava V. Priya Bhargava, 181 (2011) DLT 602, this court laid down the factors to be taken into consideration for ascertaining the income of the spouse. The relevant portion of judgment is reproduced hereunder:­ "12. It is settled position of law that a wife is entitled to live in a similar status as was enjoyed by her in her matrimonial home. It is the duty of the courts to ensure that it should not be a case that one spouse lives in a life of comfort and luxury while the other spouse lives a life of deprivation, poverty. During the pendency of divorce proceedings the parties should be able to maintain themselves and should be sufficiently entitled to the represented in judicial proceedings. It in case the party is unable to do so on account of insufficient income, the other spouse shall be liable to pay the same.
Delhi High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 37 - G S Sistani - Full Document

Smt. Jasbir Kaur Sehgal vs The District Judge Dehradun & Ors on 27 August, 1997

15. The Supreme Court of India in the case of Jasbir Kaur (Smt) (supra), has also recognized the fact that spouses n the proceedings for maintenance do not truthfully disclose their true income and therefor some guess work on the part of the Court is permissible. Further the Supreme Court has also observed that "considering the diverse claim made by the parties one inflating the income and the other suppressing an element of conjecture and guess work does enter for arriving at the income of the husband. It cannot be done by any mathematical precision".
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 471 - D P Wadhwa - Full Document

Puneet Kaur vs Inderjit Singh Sawhney on 12 September, 2011

In the detailed affidavit directed to be filed by the parties following the guidelines of Hon'ble High Court in Puneet Kaur Vs. Inderjeet Singh Sawhney, the petitioner/applicant has disclosed her educational qualification as only 12th passed, that too from National Institute of Open Schooling in the year 2004. She has parents and an unmarried sister. She has claimed herself to be not in any job. She has only one fixed deposit of Rs.1 lac and no other kind of asset i.e. movable or immovable property. However, she states to be having her bank account with Allahabad Bank being a saving account.
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 120 - J R Midha - Full Document
1