Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.27 seconds)

The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs S.Muthukarupan on 11 September, 2006

In the instant case also the assessee received the gifts along with the three other family members from the same person. The source of the 8 ITA No. 2796, 2798, 2800, 2802/M/09 Praveen Kumar (HUF) donor for making the gifts was the same and the transaction was also through the similar banking channel, therefore, in view of the ratio laid down in the aforesaid referred to case, no different stand could have been taken in the case of assessee when the department had already accepted the genuineness of a similar gift vide assessment order dated 31/03/2006 passed under section 143(3) of the Act in the case of Raj Kumar Aora HUF belonging to the same group, to which the assessee belongs. In that view of the matter, we do not see any infirmity in the order of learned CIT(A).
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras vs Sri Meenakshi Mills Ltd. & Ors on 25 October, 1966

Macdowells and Company Ltd Vs CTO 154 ITR 148, CIT Vs. Sri Meenakshi Mills Ltd. 63 ITR 609, CIT Vs Durgaprasad More - 82 ITR 540 and Juggilal Kamapat Vs CIT 73 ITR 702 (SC) "v. The learned CIT(A) has erred in holding the details filed before the A.O. proved the genuineness of the transaction without verifying the details himself as there is no finding in his order that the details filed were duly verified by him and found to be correct".
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 163 - V Ramaswami - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Durgaprasad Rajaram Adatiya on 8 April, 1983

Macdowells and Company Ltd Vs CTO 154 ITR 148, CIT Vs. Sri Meenakshi Mills Ltd. 63 ITR 609, CIT Vs Durgaprasad More - 82 ITR 540 and Juggilal Kamapat Vs CIT 73 ITR 702 (SC) "v. The learned CIT(A) has erred in holding the details filed before the A.O. proved the genuineness of the transaction without verifying the details himself as there is no finding in his order that the details filed were duly verified by him and found to be correct".
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 20 - Full Document
1