Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.22 seconds)
Amanpreet Kaur @ Preeti (In Jc) vs State on 2 August, 2024 cites

Krishan Lal Gera vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 4 July, 2011

14. It is argued that the decision in Kishan Lal v. State (supra) was passed before Section 36A of the NDPS Act had been added by way of an amendment. It is stated that Section 36A of the NDPS Act empowers the Special Court to extend the time of investigation up to one year on report of the Public Prosecutor indicating the progress of investigation and specific reasons for detention of accused.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 282 - R V Raveendran - Full Document

Satish Kumar & Anr vs State (State Of Nct Of Delhi) on 14 February, 2023

16. As noted by this Court in in Satish Kumar & Anr. v. State (supra), this Court is bound by the decision in Kishan Lal v. State (supra) as judicial discipline mandates that this Court has to decide the matters on the basis of the law as it stands and the pendency of any reference would not mean that the other proceedings involving the similar issue would remain stayed.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Y Khanna - Full Document

Mohd Suleman vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi Pwd Department & Ors on 11 January, 2023

13. This Court had also examined the issue of grant of interim bail by the Hon'ble Apex Court in cases, including, Mohd Arbaz & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi : SLP (Criminal) No. 6876- 6877/2022 and Suleman v. The State (GNCT of Delhi : SLP (Criminal) No.1929/2023, where the FSL report was not filed along with the charge sheet within a period of 180 days. It was noted that the said relief has been granted to the accused persons This is a digitally signed order.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 6 - S Mridul - Full Document

Asif Khan @ Ashu Bhai Guruji vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 7 September, 2021

12. This court, while considering the plea of default bail on the ground that charge sheet filed under Section 173(2) of the CrPC is incomplete if not accompanied with FSL report in the case of Satish Kumar & Anr. v. State : 2024:DHC:1258, concurred with the view taken by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in Arif Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi) : 2023 SCC OnLine Del 2374 and the law laid down by the Division Bench in Kishan Lal v. State (supra), and dismissed the petition. This Court held that mere non-filing of FSL Report along with the charge sheet is not sufficient to arrive at the conclusion that the charge sheet filed was incomplete. It was further observed that the said report can be filed by way of a supplementary charge sheet and in any case, FSL report is only a corroborative piece of evidence.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - M K Ohri - Full Document

Mohd. Arbaz Khan vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 1 July, 2020

13. This Court had also examined the issue of grant of interim bail by the Hon'ble Apex Court in cases, including, Mohd Arbaz & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi : SLP (Criminal) No. 6876- 6877/2022 and Suleman v. The State (GNCT of Delhi : SLP (Criminal) No.1929/2023, where the FSL report was not filed along with the charge sheet within a period of 180 days. It was noted that the said relief has been granted to the accused persons This is a digitally signed order.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 7 - Cited by 12 - M K Ohri - Full Document
1   2 Next