Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 34 (4.03 seconds)
B.S.E. Brokers Forum, Bombay & Ors. vs Securities & Exchange Board Of India & ... on 1 February, 2001 cites

Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti vs Orient Paper & Industris Ltd on 9 November, 1994

In Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti & Ors. v. Orient Paper & Industries Ltd. (1995 (1) SCC 655), rejecting the contention of the respondent therein, this Court held that the machinery created under the said Act is meant to facilitate and benefit all the buyers and sellers of all the agricultural produce within the market area and it cannot be said that the respondent-Mills is neither directly nor indirectly a beneficiary of the said machinery.
Supreme Court of India Cites 34 - Cited by 140 - P B Sawant - Full Document

The Secretary To Government Ofmadras & ... vs P.R. Sriramulu & Anr on 22 November, 1995

In the case of Secretary to Government of Madras & Anr. v. P.R. Sriramulu & Anr. (1996 (1) SCC 345) testing the validity of the Court Fee Act involved therein, this Court negatived the contention that the expenses incurred by the administration of justice in criminal courts should not be treated as sufficient quid pro quo for the levy of court fee in civil cases. It held that such levy should not be examined so minutely or be weighed in golden scale to discern any difference between the two. It also held that there could not be any scientific method by which levy of fee may be made exactly corresponding to the expenditure in a particular year relating to the administration of civil justice. It held that it is not the requirement of law that the collection raised by the levy should exactly tally or correspond to the expenditure in the administration of civil justice. It further held that the test of correlation of the collection with the services rendered is to be reckoned at the aggregate level and not at the individual level.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 74 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next