Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 26 (0.47 seconds)

Anil Kumar & Ors vs M.K Aiyappa & Anr on 1 October, 2013

25. Anil Kumar and Others vs. M.K. Aiyappa and Another 8 is cited only to show that, in dealing with a petition under Section 156(3) of the CrPC, application of mind by the Magistrate is very much essential and that it should be reflected in the order, though a detailed expression of his views is neither required nor warranted. It was also made clear in the said ruling that the order directing to register FIR under Section 156(3) of the CrPC does not amount to taking cognizance of the offence.
Supreme Court of India Cites 30 - Cited by 576 - K Radhakrishnan - Full Document

Radhey Shyam & Anr vs Chhabi Nath & Ors on 26 February, 2015

In Radhey Shyam and Another vs. Chhabi Nath and Others 9 a three member Bench of the Apex Court, considered the scope of jurisdiction under Article 227, as distinct from that under Article 226. The Bench held that Judicial orders of the Civil Court were not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Challenge to such orders would lie only by way of statutory appeal or revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, but not by a writ under Article 226 or 32 of the Constitution of India.
Supreme Court of India Cites 53 - Cited by 616 - A K Goel - Full Document
1   2 3 Next