Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.27 seconds)
A.H.Wadia Tust And 4 Ors vs State Of Maharashtra And 5 Ors on 9 January, 2023 cites

Rajesh Jain And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 24 November, 2021

46. Division Bench of this Court in case of Rajesh Jain Vs. State of Maharashtra (supra) distinguished the judgment of this Court in case of Indian Cork Mills Private Limited (supra) relied upon by learned senior counsel for the petitioner on the ground that no proposal has been submitted by the petitioner therein to implement the slum rehabilitation scheme in respect of the writ property. This Court also considered the fact that there were two petitions filed by the petitioners claimed to be the owners before this Court challenging the notification. This Court held that in absence of any proposal for implementing Slum Rehabilitation Scheme being submitted by the owners of the said property (apparently due to the disputes as regards the ownership of the said property), the question of consideration by SRA of any preferential right of the Petitioners for redevelopment of the said property did not arise.
Bombay High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - S K Shinde - Full Document

Rajesh G. Jain vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 14 November, 2022

28. Learned senior counsel made an attempt to distinguish the judgment in case of Rajesh G. Jain Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (supra) and submitted that the said judgment has been distinguished in the judgment in case of Indian Cork Mills Private Limited (supra). He submitted that section 14 of the Slum Act cannot be invoked at the behest of the owners. No notice under Section 13 was issued. No order was passed by the State Government as required under Section 14(1) of the Slum Act.
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - R N Laddha - Full Document
1   2 Next