Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.39 seconds)
Bhupinder Kumar Through His Wife Suman ... vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 7 August, 2015 cites

Subedar Anokh Singh vs The State Of Punjab And Ors. on 7 January, 1998

In the order dated 02.03.2015, the facts for decision were picked up from Surjit Singh's case (CWP No.12933 of 2001), wherein in identical situation, Surjit Singh did not opt for participation for the allotment of plots in response to the communication dated 01.03.2001, which is in the case of the petitioner - Bhupinder Kumar as well. The petitioner has categorically refused to opt for the alternative plot. In view of the said fact, the petitioner cannot seek allotment of a plot being an old applicant of the year 1984. The communication dated 04.02.2000 produced by the petitioner was not in response to any offer. Later, the option for consideration in another scheme was not accepted as per letter reproduced. Therefore, the petitioner cannot be permitted to raise any grievance in respect of the plots allotted to others and to non allotment of plot to him.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 2 - P K Jain - Full Document

Kabul Singh And Ors. vs Punjab Urban Planning And Development ... on 10 January, 1997

During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the applicant-petitioners also referred to a Division Bench judgment of this Court in Kabul Singh Vs. Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority 1997 (1) PLR 713, wherein the issue considered was, as to whether the petitioner has a legal right to be allotted HIG (Single Storey) category dwelling unit or similar property on the application made by him pursuant to a notice (Annexure P-1). The Court held that the petitioner, who applied pursuant to Annexure P-1, does not acquire perennial right of consideration for allotment of HIG house for all times to come. It has been held to the following effect:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 4 - B Rai - Full Document
1