Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (1.94 seconds)The Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887
The Delhi High Court Act, 1966
Section 38 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Smt.Subhadra & Anr. vs Delhi Development Authority on 11 November, 2010
This Court is further fortified by the observations passed
by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case titled
Subhadra v. Delhi Development Authority [ RSA 64/2020]
Suit No.606888/2016 Suleman Vs. DDA Page-18/28
Nathu Ram Jain vs Delhi Development Authority & Anr on 21 September, 2010
and further relied upon in the case of Nathu Ram v. Delhi
Development Authority [RSA No.28/2001], and stated as
thus:
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Balkrishna Dattatraya Galande vs Balkrishna Rambharose Gupta . on 6 February, 2019
In this regard, on the basis of material available on record,
the contents of plaint and cross-examination of PW-1, it is
evidently clear that, the plaintiff side has further caused
self-destruction of their own case by not being able to
prove that, either plaintiff Suleman at the time of
instituting the suit or thereafter his successor-in-interest
PW-1 was ever or still is, in the possession of the suit
property. Consequently, this Court is further fortified by
the ratio held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case titled
Balakrishna Dattaraya Galande v. Balakrishna
Rambharose Gupta & Anr [SLP (C) 1509/2019] , wherein
it has been held that:
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
1