Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 31 (0.47 seconds)The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
Section 54 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 42 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Dileep Pashwan And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 26 September, 2023
recovery, there was no need to comply with the provisions of
Sec.50 of the NDPS Act. But by relying on the aforementioned
decision in Dileep and another v. State of M.P. reported in
2007 (1) SCC 452, the Apex Court in Shah Alam's case (supra),
held that since the provisions of Sec. 50 of the Act were not
complied with, the High Court therein was right in acquitting the
accused on that ground.
Union Of India vs Shah Alam & Anr on 11 June, 2009
recovery, there was no need to comply with the provisions of
Sec.50 of the NDPS Act. But by relying on the aforementioned
decision in Dileep and another v. State of M.P. reported in
2007 (1) SCC 452, the Apex Court in Shah Alam's case (supra),
held that since the provisions of Sec. 50 of the Act were not
complied with, the High Court therein was right in acquitting the
accused on that ground.
State Of Punjab vs Balbir Singh on 1 March, 1994
In the case Dilip and another v. State of M.P. reported in
2007(1) SCC 450 = AIR 2007 SC 369 = 2007 KHC 3022, held in
para 14 thereof, after relying on the Apex Court decision in State
of Punjab v. Balbir Singh reported in 1994 (3) SCC 299, that if
during such search or arrest, there is a chance recovery of any
narcotic drug or psychotropic substance, then from that stage
Crl.A.1183/12 - : 46 :-
Gurjant Singh @ Janta vs State Of Punjab on 28 October, 2013
In the said Gurjant Singh's case, the Police party therein
Crl.A.1183/12 - : 45 :-