Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.76 seconds)
State vs Deepak @ Golu And Ors on 15 April, 2026 cites

State Of Chhattisgarh vs Sanat Kosle 9 Crmp/234/2019 State Of ... on 13 August, 2019

26. When read as whole, the testimony of injured PW1 GURVINDER PAL SINGH Rajesh can be classified in category of neither wholly reliable nor Digitally signed by GURVINDER PAL SINGH SC No. 202/2024 State vs. Deepak @ Golu & Ors. P.S Ambedkar Nagar Page 18 / 21 Date: 2026.04.15 12:27:45 +0530 wholly unreliable witness as per categorization of the witness in the case of Vadivelu Thevar v. The State of Madras, AIR 1957 SC 614.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 32 - P K Mishra - Full Document

State Of Rajasthan vs Smt. Kalki & Anr on 15 April, 1981

AIR 1975 SC 1962). As observed by this 2026.04.15 12:27:06 +0530 SC No. 202/2024 State vs. Deepak @ Golu & Ors. P.S Ambedkar Nagar Page 16 / 21 Court in State of Rajasthan v. Smt. Kalki and another, AIR 1981 SC 1390, normal discrepancies in evidence are those which are due to normal errors of observations, normal errors of memory due to lapse of time, due to mental disposition such as shock and horror at the time of occurrence and these are always there however honest and truthful a witness may be. Material discrepancies are those which are not normal and not expected of a normal person. Courts have to label the category to which a discrepancy may be categorized. While normal discrepancies do not corrode the credibility of a party's case, material discrepancies do so."
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 833 - B Islam - Full Document
1   2 3 Next