Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.54 seconds)
Kasambhai Hasambhai Pinjara vs Chunilal Bhimjibhai on 12 February, 2013 cites

Thakur Sukhpal Singh vs Thakur Kalyan Singh on 2 May, 1962

Being the final Court of fact, the first appellate court must not record mere general expression of concurrence with the trial Court judgment rather it must give reasons for its decision on such point independently to that of the trial Court. Thus, the entire evidence must be considered and discussed in detail. Such exercise should be done after formulating the points for consideration in terms of the said provisions and the Court must proceed in adherence to the requirements of the said statutory provisions. (Vide: Sukhpal Singh v. Kalyan Singh, AIR 1963 SC 146; Girijanandini Devi v. Bijendra Narain Choudhary, AIR 1967 SC 1124; G. Amalorpavam v. R.C. Diocese of Madurai, 2006 (3) SCC 224;
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 195 - R Dayal - Full Document

G. Amalorpavam & Ors vs R.C. Diocese Of Madurai & Ors on 6 March, 2006

Being the final Court of fact, the first appellate court must not record mere general expression of concurrence with the trial Court judgment rather it must give reasons for its decision on such point independently to that of the trial Court. Thus, the entire evidence must be considered and discussed in detail. Such exercise should be done after formulating the points for consideration in terms of the said provisions and the Court must proceed in adherence to the requirements of the said statutory provisions. (Vide: Sukhpal Singh v. Kalyan Singh, AIR 1963 SC 146; Girijanandini Devi v. Bijendra Narain Choudhary, AIR 1967 SC 1124; G. Amalorpavam v. R.C. Diocese of Madurai, 2006 (3) SCC 224;
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 235 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Legal Heirs Of Deceased Budhabhai ... vs Shantaben Wd/O Bhalabhai Becharbhai ... on 8 June, 2017

In a recent case of Budhabhai Bhikhabhai Parmarand and another Vs. Shantaben Wd/o Bhalabhai Becharbhai, 2013(1)G.L.H.127, this Court, while dealing with the provision of Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the provisions of order 41, Rule 31 of the Code by relying upon the case of H. Siddiqui (dead) by LRs. (supra), has held that the first Appellate Court has to decide the Appeal in accordance with law on merits and after framing points for determination as envisaged under Order-41, Rule-31 of the Code. It has also been observed that on each point, the Appellate Court has to give its own finding that too after re-appreciation of entire evidence on record.
Gujarat High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 97 - B M Trivedi - Full Document

Dumala Vaghpara Gram Panchayat vs Chunilal Tribhovandas Patel on 13 July, 1999

10. A similar view was taken by this Court in the case of Mahmad Ahmadbhai vs. Fatmaben Abdulla & Ors. as reported in 2007 (4) GLR 2789; in the case of Prajapati Abraham Nagarbhai & Anr. Vs. Prajapati Harjibhai & Ors., 2010 (2) GLH 551 as well as in the case of Dumala Vahpara Gram Panchayat vs. Chunilal Tribhovandas Patel & Ors., as reported at 1999(2) GLH 959.
Gujarat High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 108 - J R Vora - Full Document
1   2 Next