Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.25 seconds)Section 3 in The Essential Commodities Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Essential Commodities Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Niranjan Lall Arya vs State on 21 March, 1952
2. Leraned Counsel for Baboo Lal urged firstly that admission of the facts put to Baboo Lal by the Magistrate did not amount to a plea of guilt because according to the law. Baboo Lal could have submitted the return by the 5th of March, 1973 which he did, and the possession of foodgrains in excess of clause 3, if so declared, was not illegal Baboo Lal thus committed no offence. Any plea of guilt in the mistaken belief in regard to the position of law, is no admission of guilt at all and he placed reliance on Niranjan Lal Arya v. State .
1