Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.26 seconds)Section 56 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 39 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 147 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 149 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
New India Assurance Co., Ltd., vs Yallavva W/O Yamanappa Dharnakeri on 12 May, 2020
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Sushil Kumar Godara on 30 September, 2021
24. The evidence of RW.2 shows that though they had
issued policy with the knowledge that the registration
certificate has expired, the driver of the vehicle was not
charge sheeted for those offences under the MV Act. Under
the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the judgment in Sushil
Kumar Godara's case referred to supra is not applicable to the
facts of the case.
Section 229 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Pranay Sethi on 31 October, 2017
29. Having regard to the age of the claimant, the
prevailing wage rates and the cost of living during the said
period, the Tribunal ought to have taken notional income at
Rs.9,500/- per month. Having regard to the judgment of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in National Insurance Company
Limited vs. Pranay Sethi4 and the nature of the employment
of the claimant, the Tribunal should have added 40% of the
notional income to the same by way of future prospects which
comes to 9,500 x 40%= Rs.3,800/-. Therefore his monthly
income comes to Rs.9,500+3,800= 13,300/- per month. The
disability spoken by the doctor is 15% to the whole body. The
medical and other records show that the claimant was aged 22
years. The applicable multiplier was 18. Therefore, the
compensation payable on the head of loss of future income
comes to Rs.4,30,920/- (13,300 x 15%=1995 x 18 x 12).
4
AIR 2017 SC 5157