Shreenidhi M A vs Government Of Karnataka on 10 December, 2013
12) Upon considering the present facts and
circumstances of the case, it is opined that no prejudice
will be caused to the defendants, if the name of the
plaintiff is ordered to be changed. The Hon'ble High
10
O S No.5106/2022
Court of Karnataka in R.F.A. No.947/2013 (DEC) in the
case of Shreenidhi M.A. Vs. Government of Karnataka
and others made it clear that there is no necessity to
obtain the certificate or suggestion report from the
Astrologer and even the evidence of Astrologer is not
necessary. Therefore, in the absence of oral evidence of
Astrologer and on the basis of oral evidence of Plaintiff
along with Ex.P.3 - Report, it is opined that the plaintiff
has made out a case for requesting to declare his name
as 'Beeresh N Gundur' instead of 'Beerappa'.