Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.19 seconds)
M/S B K M India Private Limited vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 8 August, 2023 cites

Haryana State Agricultural Marketing ... vs Sh. Ganesh Rice And General Mills And Anr on 4 December, 1998

In so far as the judgment in the matter of Ganesh Rice Mills (supra) is concerned, it relates to delayed submission of the requisite forms. The present case does not fall in the category of delayed submissions of Forms rather a specific finding has been recorded by the respondents that the requisite compliance had not been done at all and the bills and bilties 15 of 17 ::: Downloaded on - 17-09-2023 18:15:10 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:103572 CWP-5558-2015 (O&M). -16- 2023:PHHC:103572 submitted along with the Form K-1 (which such form is also disputed) since the same has not been signed by the Secretary of Market Committee, Jaitan) do not corroborate the claim of the petitioner. Emphasis was laid on a stamping done on the top of the said form as a token of deposit which is incorrect since the stamp is rather a diary number of submission of the said form and not a verification by the Secretary of the notified Market Committee with regard to execution/attestation of Form K-1 as a token of deposit of Fee. The column is lying blank and unstamped.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Punjab State Agricultural Marketing ... vs State Of Punjab And Another on 28 September, 1989

In so far as reference to the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the matter of The Punjab State Agricultural Marketing Board and another (supra) is concerned, the said judgment also does not come to the aid of the petitioner. It has been held in para No.3 thereof that the revisional authority recorded a categorical finding of fact that no KK Form was issued by the selling Authority and after noticing that there was a disputed question of fact that had arisen and it was held that the writ Court would not interfere in such a finding of fact. The above said judgment rather rules against the petitioner.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1