Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.44 seconds)Article 47 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors vs M.P. Ojha And Anr on 18 December, 1997
The rules under interpretation in M.P. Ojha's case (supra) were more or less similar to the rules in question involved in the present case. There appears to be no plausible reasoning behind Annexure R/l/T, which, as already noticed, is more than ambiguous. The protection granted to a government employee under the constitutional provisions and the rules, cannot be taken away by virtue of issuing such kind of instructions without, there being an appropriate legislation or delegated legislative powers vested in the authorities concerned.
State Of Punjab & Ors vs Ram Lubhaya Bagga Etc. Etc on 26 February, 1998
9. The importance of public health in a democratic society was accepted by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Punjab and Ors. v. Ram Lubhaya Bagga, etc. etc., J.T. 1998(2) S.C. 136, where the Court accepted protection to health to include care for health and being fully protected under Article 21 of the Constitution of India which casts an obligation upon the State to provide such protection under Article 47 of the Constitution of India and held as under:-
1