cites: 75832040

State Of Uttaranchal & Anr .... ... vs Dinesh Kumar Sharma ....Respond on 4 December, 2006

ZAIDI ZAIDI 2025.06.02 17:25:34 +0800 (Isra Zaidi) JMFC-04/NE/KKD/Delhi 02.06.2025 FIR No.41/2007 14/14 State Vs. Dinesh Kumar etc.

Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 208 - A R Lakshmanan - Full Document

Section 379 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 193147

Section 411 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 73191

Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 748445

Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 241306

The Indian Penal Code, 1860

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 699242

Sri. Sujit Biswas vs State Of Assam on 28 May, 2013

8. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Sujit Biswas vs. State of Assam decided on 28th May, 2013 held as under:-

Supreme Court of India Cites 27 - Cited by 555 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

State Thorugh C.B.I vs Mahender Singh Dahiya on 28 January, 2011

State of M.P., AIR 1952 SC 343; State through CBI v. Mahender Singh Dahiya, AIR 2011 SC 1017; and Ramesh Harijan v. State of U.P., AIR 2012 SC 1979)."

Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 346 - S S Nijjar - Full Document

Ramesh Harijan vs State Of U.P on 21 May, 2012

State of M.P., AIR 1952 SC 343; State through CBI v. Mahender Singh Dahiya, AIR 2011 SC 1017; and Ramesh Harijan v. State of U.P., AIR 2012 SC 1979)."

Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 457 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

Khalil Khan vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 8 October, 2003

In the case of Shingara Singh v. State of Haryana (2003)12 SCC 758 it was held that any defect in the site plan creates a doubt regarding the place of occurrence and accused is entitled to get the benefit of doubt. The site plan prepared by the IO Ex.PW-8/A was not even signed by the complainant. It is doubtful that the site plan was prepared at the instance of the complainant.

Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 64 - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results