Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.25 seconds)
Neeraj Bishnoi vs Pr Director Of Audit North Western ... on 27 February, 2026 cites

The State Of Haryana & Ors vs Ram Kumar Mann on 20 February, 1997

17. It must be noted here that following the aforementioned decision in State of Haryana v. Ram Kumar Mann (supra), a Full Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Kartar Singh v. State of Haryana (1998) 119 PLR 448, in reference to the interpretation of Rule 7.5 of the Punjab Civil Service Rules, which is in pari materia with Rule 26 (4) of the of the CCS (Pension) Rules observed as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 254 - Full Document

Kartar Singh And Others vs State Of Haryana Through Inspector ... on 26 August, 1982

17. It must be noted here that following the aforementioned decision in State of Haryana v. Ram Kumar Mann (supra), a Full Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Kartar Singh v. State of Haryana (1998) 119 PLR 448, in reference to the interpretation of Rule 7.5 of the Punjab Civil Service Rules, which is in pari materia with Rule 26 (4) of the of the CCS (Pension) Rules observed as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 60 - V D Tulzapurkar - Full Document

The Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi vs Kamlesh Rani Bhatla on 23 March, 2023

14, Learned counsel for the applicant relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 23.03.2023 passed in the case of The Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. vs. Kamlesh Rani Bhatla [Civil Appeal No. 1927/2023 - arising out of Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 2139/2021]. In the aforesaid case, the Government employee had also resigned from service and participated in NATHU LAL Digitally signed by NATHU LAL KUMAWAT Reason: your signing reason here KUMAWAT Date: 2026.03.02 11:18:24+05'30' OA No. 121/2024 12 election for the post of a Counsellor of Municipal Corporation of Delhi. On losing the election, she also applied for withdrawing of a resignation which was rejected by her department only on the ground that the Memorandum of Charges had been issued against her and there were no other ground. Some of the relevant extracts of the above mentioned judgment dated 23.03.2023 are reproduced below: -
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - A Bose - Full Document
1