Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.22 seconds)
S.Sivasankar vs Member Secretary on 8 January, 2020 cites

Charles. K. Skaria vs Dr.C.Mathew on 19 March, 1980

“8.This principle was explained and applied in Charles K. Skaria & Ors. v. Dr. C. Mathew & Ors. 1980 (2) SCC 752. The controversy here related to admission to a post graduate course in medicine. The relevant rule provided for addition of 10% marks if a candidate possessed a diploma in the relevant subject or sub-specialty and this benefit could be given only if the candidate's success in the diploma 7/13 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P(MD)No.11802 of 2014 course was brought to the knowledge of the Selection Committee before completion of selection in an authentic or acceptable manner. The Prospectus provided that the attested copies of statement of marks and other documents should be attached with every application. Three such candidates were given admission who had not attached the certificate of having passed the diploma along with their applications. Their admission to post graduate course was set aside by the High Court on the ground that their applications, wherein they claimed the benefit of diploma, were liable to be rejected as the requisite certificates had not been attached. This Court speaking through Krishna Iyer, J. reversed the judgment of the High Court and held that the admission to the candidates had rightly been given as they had in fact passed the diploma before the date fixed. The relevant parts of paras 20 and 24 of the judgment, where this principle was highlighted are being reproduced below:
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 230 - V R Iyer - Full Document
1