Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.35 seconds)

Kamaljit Singh vs State Of Punjab on 16 October, 2003

I am unable to accept such contention. A hansua/katari has a sharp cutting edge and a flat side. Post mortem doctor found a number of incised wounds on the body of the victim. This shows that the appellant had indiscriminately attacked Mousumi both with the sharp edge and flat surface of the weapon. Assault by the flat surface of the Katari would have an impact akin to a blunt weapon. As a result, in addition to incised cut wounds depressed fracture of the scalp was caused. It is trite law unless ocular version is wholly improbabilised by medical evidence, the former ought to be accepted. (See Kamaljit Singh vs. State of Punjab1 and Ramanand Yadav vs. Prabhu Nath Jha and Others2). No such situation has arisen in the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 93 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Ramanand Yadav vs Prabhu Nath Jha And Ors on 31 October, 2003

I am unable to accept such contention. A hansua/katari has a sharp cutting edge and a flat side. Post mortem doctor found a number of incised wounds on the body of the victim. This shows that the appellant had indiscriminately attacked Mousumi both with the sharp edge and flat surface of the weapon. Assault by the flat surface of the Katari would have an impact akin to a blunt weapon. As a result, in addition to incised cut wounds depressed fracture of the scalp was caused. It is trite law unless ocular version is wholly improbabilised by medical evidence, the former ought to be accepted. (See Kamaljit Singh vs. State of Punjab1 and Ramanand Yadav vs. Prabhu Nath Jha and Others2). No such situation has arisen in the present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 171 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1