Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.22 seconds)Section 2 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Centrlal Board Of Sec.Education & Anr vs Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors on 9 August, 2011
7. The Commission after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the
case, hearing the Respondent and perusal of the records, notes that the
queries raised by the Appellant are largely in the nature of seeking
clarifications, opinions, explanations and hypothetical scenarios regarding the
mechanism of GST collection, remittance and its linkage with income tax. In
this regard, the Commission notes that as per the provisions of Section 2(f) of
the RTI Act, only such information can be provided which is available on record
and held by or under the control of the Public Authority. The CPIO is not
obliged to create information, draw inferences, or provide
advice/interpretation to the applicant. The reply furnished by the CPIO
appropriately reflects this legal position and is in consonance with the law laid
down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in CBSE vs. Aditya Bandopadhyay and
various decisions of the Commission. Accordingly, the Commission finds no
infirmity in the replies given by the Respondent Public Authorities.
Section 8 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
The Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
1