cites: 7620956

Ajaib Singh vs Sirhind Coop. ... on 8 April, 1999

In a subsequent decision in Balbir Singh v. Punjab Roadways : (2001) 1 SCC 133, this Court observed that Ajaib Singh v. Sirhind Cooperative Marketing-cum-Processing Service Society Limited and Anr. : (1999) 6 SCC 82 was confined to the facts and circumstances of that case.

Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 128 - Full Document

The Limitation Act, 1963

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 47361

Balbir Singh vs Punjab Roadways & Anr. on 8 December, 2000

It is true that in Balbir Singh v. Punjab Roadways : (2001) 1 SCC 133, the plea of delay was raised before the Industrial Tribunal but we would emphasize the passage from Balbir Singh v. Punjab Roadways : (2001) 1 SCC 133 where it was said:

Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 38 - Full Document

Asst.Engineer,Rajasthan Dev.Corp.& ... vs Gitam Singh on 31 January, 2013

19. We are clearly of the view that though Limitation Act, 1963 is not applicable to the reference made under the I.D. Act but delay in raising industrial dispute is definitely an important circumstance which the Labour Court must keep in view at the time of exercise of discretion irrespective of whether or not such objection has been raised by the other side. The legal position laid down by this Court in Assistant Engineer, Rajasthan Development Corporation and Anr. v. Gitam Singh : (2013) 5 SCC 136 that before exercising its judicial discretion, the Labour Court has to keep in view all relevant factors including the mode and manner of appointment, nature of employment, length of service, the ground on which termination has been set aside and the delay in raising industrial dispute before grant of relief in an industrial dispute, must be invariably followed."

Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 505 - R M Lodha - Full Document