Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.16 seconds)

State Of West Bengal & Anr vs Saral Kumar Sen Gupta & Anr on 15 April, 1986

2. We have carefully considered the grounds raised by the review applicants. The contentions now put-forth by the review applicants have already been dealt with in the OA and it appears that an attempt is being made to re-agitate the issue, which is not the scope and ambit of review defined under Section 22 (3) (f) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. Accordingly RA is dismissed, in circulation, in view of the decision of the Apex Court in State of West Bengal v. Kamal Sen Gupta, (2008 (9) SCALE 509".
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 92 - E S Venkataramiah - Full Document

P.U. Joshi & Ors., Union Of India & Ors vs The Accountant General, Ahmedabad, & ... on 19 December, 2002

17. Introducing a Scheme or to withdrawing the same is a policy decision of the respondent-ITDC. After the scrapping of the earlier Scheme, the ITDC and its Unions have entered into agreement, for certain new schemes. Hence, in this view of the matter and in view 11 TA No.1150/2009 of the observations in P.U. Joshi (supra), we cannot accept the contention of the applicants with regard to medical schemes.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 558 - D Raju - Full Document
1