Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.19 seconds)
Aishwarya Sanjay Salve vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 1 July, 2016 cites

Chandra vs M.Thangmuthu & Anr on 7 September, 2010

13. If findings of the Committee are carefully perused, the finding of facts recorded by the Committee that the petitioner is Christian by religion is without any basis and the said finding is perverse, unjust, inasmuch as, there is no documentary evidence on record which would suggest that the petitioner professes Christianity by way of conversion. The Committee has not kept in view the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the aforementioned authoritative pronouncement and proceeded to invalidate the claim of the petitioner only on the basis of Vigilance Cell's report.
Supreme Court of India Cites 36 - Cited by 111 - H L Dattu - Full Document
1