Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.34 seconds)Section 33 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 25F in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
The Payment Of Bonus Act, 1965
Section 33C in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Jagannath Bhagwandas Shrivastav And ... vs Harish Thadani And Anr. on 12 February, 1993
In Jagannath Bhagwandas Shrivastav and Others VS. Harish
Thadani and another 1993 L48. LC. 2508, Bombay Single Bench of
Bombay High Court has held as follows:
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Management Of Fertilizer Corporation ... vs The Workmen on 15 November, 1968
"It is clear from the scheme of the S. 33 C and language of sub
sec (2) thereof that the only limited question that a Labour
Court can decide under this sub-section is that amount at
which any benefit should be computed", provided however,
that the workman "is entitled to receive from the employer any,
money or benefit". This section postulates the existence of any
relationship of an employer and workman and entitlement of a
workman to certain benefits. The only dispute that can be
decided by the Labour court under this section is in a very
narrow compass, that is, relating to the computation of the
amount of money that may be due. Where the very foundation
is absent, the remedy provided to a workman under the sub-
section cannot be availed of. The power of the court in a
proceeding U/S 33 C (2) of the Act, as observed by Supreme
Court in CIWT Corporation Vs. Workmen 1974 LIC 1018:
Basant Lal vs The Management Of A.F. Ferguson & Co. And ... on 30 January, 2002
In Basant Lal vs. Management of M/S A.F. Ferguson & Co. &
Anr. 2002 LLR 612 (Delhi), our Honourable High Court observed
as follows: