Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)Section 401 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 410 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 395 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Probation of Offenders Act, 1958
Ram Briksh Singh & Ors vs Ambika Yadav & Anr on 9 March, 2004
In embarking upon the minutest re-examination of the whole
evidence at the revisional stage, the learned Judge of the High Court was
totally oblivious of the self-restraint that he was required to exercise in a
revision under Section 397 CrPC. On behalf of the accused, reliance is
placed on the decision of this Court to which one of us (Justice Sabharwal)
is a party, i.e. Criminal Appeal No. 523 of 1997 decided on 9.3.2004
[Ram Briksh v. Ambika Yadav]. That was the case in which the High Court
interfered in revision because material evidence was overlooked by the
courts below.
1