Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.28 seconds)Tahir vs State (Delhi) on 21 March, 1996
Reliance in that
regard is laid upon the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court of
India in Tahir Vs. State (Delhi) (1996) 3 SCC 338, wherein it
has been observed as hereinunder:
State Of Punjab vs Balbir Singh on 1 March, 1994
At
this juncture, reliance can be placed on the judgment of Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the case of State of Punjab Vs. Balbir Singh
(1994) 3 SCC 299 wherein it was held as herein under:
Section 100 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 165 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 207 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 281 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 294 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sadhu Singh Roda S/O Buta Singh Etc vs State Of Punjab on 25 January, 1984
11. It is a paramount tenet of criminal law that every
accused is presumed to be innocent and cannot be convicted
unless the prosecution is able to discharge the initial onus rested
upon it beyond all reasonable doubts. The failure to do so would
necessarily result in acquittal of accused. It has been held by
Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in Sadhu Singh Vs.
State of Punjab (1997) 3 RCR (Cri) 421:
"5. In a criminal trial, it is for the prosecution to establish its
case beyond all reasonable doubts. It is for the prosecution to
travel the entire distance from 'may have' to 'must have'. If the
prosecution appears to be improbable or lacks credibility the
benefit of doubt necessarily has to go to the accused."
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
1