Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.88 seconds)Section 37 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 70 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Konkan Railway Corporation Limited vs Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking on 17 August, 2023
30. The impugned judgment has correctly held that the Respondent was
entitled to the reimbursement of expenses incurred by it notwithstanding the
absence of the concluded contract pursuant to Section 70 of the Contract Act
which incorporates the doctrine of quantum meruit as the said view taken in the
award is not liable to be interfered with under Section 34 of the Act. The
impugned judgment has also examined the law on the aspect of quantum meruit
as discussed in the award and concluded that the view taken in the award is
plausible and based on the application of law laid down in the judgment referred
to in the award.
M.C.D. vs Ravi Kumar on 22 November, 2017
In addition, the impugned judgment has also relied upon the
decision of this Court in the matter of M.C.D. v. Ravi Kumar (2017) SCC
OnLine Del 11902 on the aspect of compensation under Section 70 of the
Contract Act. In view of the same, the impugned judgment has correctly
observed that the reliance upon Section 70 of the Contract Act to assess the
amount to be awarded for the work performed by the Respondent cannot be
faulted with.
The Indian Contract Act, 1872
Mmtc Ltd. vs M/S.Vedanta Ltd. on 18 February, 2019
a) MMTC Ltd v. Vedanta Ltd (2019) 4 SCC 16
Section 37 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
1