Umesh Kumar Nagpal vs State Of Haryana (Sawant, J.) on 4 May, 1994
i. Umesh Kumar Nagpal Vs State of Haryana (1994) 4 SCC 138;
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.22 seconds)Jagdish Prasad vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 13 November, 1995
ii. Jagdish Prasad Vs State of Bihar (1996) 1 SCC 301
iii.
M/S. Hajee S.V.M. Mohamed Jamaludeen ... vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 24 February, 1997
S.Mohan Vs Government of T.N (1998) 9 SCC 485
The Chief Commissioner Central Excise & ... vs Prabhat Singh & Another on 9 August, 2011
11. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Chief Commissioner, Central
Excise & Customs, Lucknow and Ors. V. Prabhat Singh in CA No.8635 of 2012
decided on 30.11.2012 had held that
"Courts and Tribunals should not fall prey to any sympathy
syndrome, so as to issue direction for compassionate
appointments, without reference to prescribed norms,
Courts are not supposed to carry Santa Claus's big bag on
Christmas eve, to disburse the compassionate appointment,
to all those who seek a Court's intervention. Courts and
Tribunals must understand that every such act of sympathy,
compassion and discretion, wherein directions are issued for
appointment on compassionate ground, could deprive a
really needed family requiring financial support, and
thereby push into penury a truly indigent destitute and
impoverished family. Discretion is therefore ruled out. So
are misplaced sympathy and compassion."
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 19 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
1