Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.19 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 53 in The Delhi Development Authority Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957
Section 7 in The Court-fees Act, 1870 [Entire Act]
Anil Sagar vs Gaon Sabha Village & Ors. on 2 December, 1999
The said
report wherein no opportunity was given to one of the effected party
New Case No. 7535/16 (old case no. 175/04) Page No. 10/21
cannot be relied upon. The said report thus also ignores the mandate
provided under Rule 170 of Delhi Land Reform Rules as well as
principles of Natural Justice. The chairman of the Board was not acting
as representative of DDA but as Court Commissioner hence the other
affected party's view should have been considered before finalization of
report. To support this view I am guided by Anil Sagar Vs. Gaon
Sabha and ors., 84 2000 DLT 212.
The Delhi Land Reforms Rules, 1954
Anathula Sudhakar vs P. Buchi Reddy (Dead) By Lrs & Ors on 25 March, 2008
32. In the subsequent suits filed by the plaintiffs namely Rattan Singh
and Bal Dei bearing no. 16/09 and 17/09 respectively both of them
claimed permanent injunction qua property measuring 1 bigha 10 biswas
of khasra no. 317 min. The said claim of face of it is liable to be rejected
as revenue record Ex. PW2/1 itself rebuts their claim of possession as
school is also occupying major part of said land. Thus injunction qua
suit property has been sought without the plaintiff being in possession of
entire suit property. Thus suit is liable to be dismissed in view of the law
laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Anathula Sudhakar Vs. P.
Buchi Reddy, AIR 2008 SC 2033.
Smt. Lalita James And Ors. vs Ajit Kumar And Ors. on 21 August, 1989
In this regard, the judgment of
Hon'ble High Court titled as Lalita James Vs. Ajit Kumar, AIR 1991
MP 15 is relevant wherein it was observed as under:
"It is well settled rule of law that burden of proving his
case to obtain relief from the Court is always on the
plaintiff who must adduce reliable and admissible
evidence for the said purpose. Section 102 of the
Evidence At contains the broad rule in this behalf and
therefore, provides the legal guidelines in the matter.
1