Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.32 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 279 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 304A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Ranjit Singh vs State Of Haryana on 11 September, 2008
(Shiva Ram v State 1965 All 196, (1965) 1 Cr LJ
524; Ranjit Singh v State of Haryana 1988 Chand Cr Cases 516
(P&H)) IPC. Our Delhi High Court has also taken a similar view and it
was held that there was no need to impose any separate sentence for
minor sentence under sections 279 because the offence under sections
304A and 338, IPC, are similar offence in aggravated forms.
Bilal Hajar @ Abdul Hameed vs State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police on 10 October, 2018
Thus the
sentence imposed under section 279 was set aside (See Abdul
Hameed v State (1990) 41 DLT 306, 307; Hamid Khan v State 1996
(1) Crimes 465 (Del).
Haji Hamid Khan And Anr vs State on 6 June, 2011
Thus the
sentence imposed under section 279 was set aside (See Abdul
Hameed v State (1990) 41 DLT 306, 307; Hamid Khan v State 1996
(1) Crimes 465 (Del).
Section 133 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 207 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of Karnataka vs Muralidhar on 16 March, 2009
10. "Rashness" consists in hazarding a dangerous or wanton
act with the knowledge that it is so, and that it may cause injury. The
criminality lies in such a case in running the risk of doing such an act
with recklessness, or indifference as to the consequences. Criminal neg-
ligence on the other hand, is the gross and culpable neglect or failure to
exercise that reasonable and proper care and precaution to guard
against injury either to the public generally or to an individual in particu-
lar, which, having regard to all the circumstances out of which the charge
has arisen it was the imperative duty of the accused person to have
adopted. (AIR 2009 SUPREME COURT 1621 "State of Karnataka v.
Muralidhar")