cites: 76592870

State Of Chhattisgarh vs Brijmohan Nayak 28 Mcc/83/2018 M/S Rama ... on 3 August, 2018

17. Exhibit PW12/E Interrogation report of accused, Mubarak B. Defence Nil documents C. Court Exhibits Nil documents D. Material Objects Nil documents ***** ***** ***** SC No. 523/2025 State v. Mubarak & Ors.

Chattisgarh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 105 - S Agrawal - Full Document

Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 748445

Section 308 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 47963

Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 502221

Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 555422

The Indian Penal Code, 1860

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 699242

Section 41 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 11255

Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 93909

Hamlet @ Sasi & Ors vs State Of Kerala on 21 August, 2003

43. The ingredients of Section 34 are that the accused persons had acted in furtherance of their common intention is required to be proved specifically or by inference - See Hamlet alias Sasi & Ors. v. State of Kerala - (2003) 10 SCC 108.

Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 33 - Full Document

Abdul Sayeed vs State Of M.P on 14 September, 2010

47. Now coming to the two main eyewitnesses, Manju Devi (PW-2) and Chanda (PW-9), who also happens to be the victims. The testimony of the injured witness is accorded a special status in law. This is as a consequence of the fact that the injury to the witness is an in-built guarantee of his presence at the scene of the crime and because the witness will not want to let the actual assailant go unpunished merely to falsely implicate a third party for the commission of the offence. Thus, the deposition of the injured witness should be relied upon unless there are strong grounds for rejection of their evidence on the basis of major contradiction and discrepancies - See Abdul Sayeed v. State of M.P. - 2010 INSC 608.

Supreme Court of India Cites 55 - Cited by 882 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results