Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 34 (0.25 seconds)Section 3 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
Section 19 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
Section 4A in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Ã ... vs Mubasir Ahmed & Anr. Ã .Respondents on 1 February, 2007
11. This Court is of the view that as there is conflict between the views in the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Pratap Narain Singh Deo v. Shrinivas Sabata and Anr. (supra) and in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Mubasir Ahmed and Anr. (supra) (which is two-Judge Bench judgment), this Court can prefer the view taken in the judgment in the case of Pratap Narain Singh Deo (supra) rather than the view taken in the judgment in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd. (supra) in view of the aforesaid discussion.
Pratap Narain Singh Deo vs Srinivas Sabata And Anr on 4 December, 1975
The two-Judge Bench in Neelakandan's case (supra), however, did not take notice of the judgment of the Larger Bench in Pratap Narain Singh Deo's case 1976 ACJ 141 (SC), "as it presumably was not brought to the notice of their Lordships.
Mattulal vs Radhe Lal on 23 April, 1974
10.3 This Court also relies on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Pratap Narain Singh Deo (supra) and did not rely upon the recent two Judge Bench judgment in the case of Mubasir Ahmed (supra) and in view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Kerala State Electricity Board v. Valsala K. reported in 2000 ACJ 5 and also the decision in the case of Mattulal v. Radhey Lal (supra) where the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that when there is a conflict of views amongst two judgments of the Apex Court, the Court is bound by the judgment of the Larger Bench.
The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923
Kerala State Electricity Board And ... vs Valsala K And Another on 16 September, 1999
The said view has been followed by the Full Bench judgment of the Kerala High Court in the case of United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Alavi which judgment has been held to be correctly decided in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Kerala State Electricity Board (supra), and therefore, this Court also relies on the same.