Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (1.04 seconds)Kerala Land Assignment Rules, 1964
The Right To Fair Compensation And Transparency In Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
State Of Kerala & Ors vs E.K. Bhaskaran Pillai on 17 April, 2007
Therefore on the basis of the
judgment in W.A.No.2430 of 2008 and connected case which
distinguished Bhaskaran Pillai's case cited supra on the ground that not
even an inch of the property acquired was used for the purpose for which
it was acquired and the project was abandoned, I am of the view that the
claim of the petitioners has to be considered in the light of the judgment of
this Court in W.A.Nos.2430 and 2370 of 2008.
The Kerala State Co-Operative ... vs W.P.(C).No.10054/2020 :: 2 on 21 May, 2020
After the case was remitted back to the Government by this Court as per
Ext.P10 judgment, the matter was considered again and the Government
took a stand that the demand of the petitioners could not be accepted due
to the huge difference in the value of the property and on the basis of the
judgments of the Apex Court. It is further submitted that the fair value and
market value of the property in Sholayar Village is Rs.4,500/- and
25,000/- per Are respectively. It is also submitted that the Government is
holding the property for the benefit of the entire community of the State
and therefore the Government cannot assign the land to the petitioners
after accepting the property having less value which was purchased by
the petitioners in the Sholayar Village. It is submitted that in the absence
of public interest the petitioners cannot claim assignment of land by
invoking the provisions of the Kerala Land Assignment Act and the
learned Government Pleader relies on the judgment in State of Kerala v.
W.P.(C) Nos.4555, 4556, 4564, 4581, 4604,
4608, 4618, 4624, 4630, 4640, 4645, 4666,
4670 and 4684 of 2022
39
2025:KER:19866
Bhaskaran Pillai, 1997 KHC 353 wherein it is held that when the
acquired land is not fully utilised it cannot be re-conveyed to the owner at
the price acquired and sought for dismissal of the writ petition.
1