Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 66 (1.33 seconds)
Shivangi Gangwar vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others on 23 May, 2018 cites

Rudul Sah vs State Of Bihar And Another on 1 August, 1983

"9. Various aspects of the Public Law field were considered. It was found that though initially a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution relating to contractual matters was held not to lie, the law underwent a change by subsequent decisions and it was noticed that even though the petition may relate essentially to a contractual matter, it would still be amenable to the writ jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226. The Public Law remedies have also been extended to the realm of tort. This Court, in its various decisions, has entertained petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution on a number of occasions and has awarded compensation to the petitioners who had suffered personal injuries at the hands of the officers of the Govt. The causing of injuries, which amounted to tortious act, was compensated by this Court in many of its decisions beginning from Rudul Sah v. State of Bihar,(1983) 3 SCR 508 : (1983) 4 SCC 141 : AIR 1983 SC 1086.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 430 - Y V Chandrachud - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next