Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (1.61 seconds)Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Rehmat vs The State Haryana on 3 September, 1996
13. Further, I find that the Complainant was examined by doctor in SDN
Hospital on the day of the incident but she did not disclose the name of the
assailant/s, who allegedly gave beatings to her despite the fact that she knew the
accused persons even prior to the incident and this also throws a doubt over the
story of the prosecution and strengthen the defence of false implication. Perusal
of the MLC also reveals that complainant was fit for statement at the time of
examination. I am enlightened by the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court of
India in case titled as "Rehmat Vs. State of Haryana" cited as '1996 (3) RCR
588' (Crl. Appeal No. 178-179 of 1989). The relevant extract of the same is
reproduced below for easy reference: -
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Hem Raj & Ors vs State Of Haryana on 29 March, 2005
In the case of Hem Raj Vs. State of Haryana AIR 2005 SC 2110, it has
been observed that:
1