Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 88 (1.81 seconds)

Purushottam Dashrath Borate & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 8 May, 2015

In fact, as has been noted by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mukesh (supra) quoting another judgment of Supreme Court in the case of Purushottam Dashrath Borate & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra as reported in (2015) 6 SCC 652, the age of the accused or family background of the accused or lack of criminal antecedents cannot 50 CRRFC-08/2018 & CR.A.5950/2018 be said to be the mitigating circumstances. It cannot also be considered as mitigating circumstances particularly taking into consideration the nature of heinous offence, cold and calculated manner in which it was committed by the accused persons. In para 516, it has been held that there is reasonable expectation of the society that deterrent punishment commensurate with the gravity of the offence be awarded. When the crime is brutal, shocking the collective conscience of the community, sympathy in any form would be misplaced and it would shake the confidence of public in the administration of criminal justice system.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 31 - H L Dattu - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next