Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.23 seconds)Gopalkrishna vs Babulal on 9 May, 2018
(n) This reserve and exceptional power of judicial
intervention is not to be exercised just for grant of relief
in individual cases but should be directed for promotion
of public confidence in the administration of justice in
the larger public interest - 3 whereas Article 226 is
5
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE
W. A. No.719 of 2018
(Gopalkrishna vs. Babulal & others)
meant for protection of individual grievance. Therefore,
the power under Article 227 may be unfettered but its
exercise is subject to high degree of judicial discipline
pointed out above.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Code Of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002
Section 115 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 125 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Shalini Shyam Shetty & Anr vs Rajendra Shankar Patil on 23 July, 2010
The apex court in the case of Shalini_Shyam Shetty Vs.
Rajendra Shankar Patil reported in 2010 (8) SCC 329 - 2 in
paragraph 49 held as under:
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
L. Chandra Kumar vs Union Of India And Others on 18 March, 1997
(i) High Court's power of superintendence under Article
227 cannot be curtailed by any statute. It has been
declared a part of the basic structure of the Constitution
by the Constitution Bench of this Court in the case of L.
Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India & others, reported in
(1997) 3 SCC 261 and therefore abridgement by a
Constitutional amendment is also very doubtful.
1