Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.22 seconds)Section 85 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
K.K. Velusamy vs N. Palaanisamy on 30 March, 2011
In support of his argument, the
learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance on the case of K.K. Velusamy V.
N. Palanisamy, reported in (2011) 11 SCC 275. Para 14 thereof, on which the
learned counsel for the petitioners has relied on, is quoted below:-
Bachhaj Nahar vs Nilima Mandal & Ors on 23 September, 2008
In this
CRP (I/O) 92/2017 Page 6 of 10
connection, I find support from the case of Bachhaj Nahar Vs. Nilima Mandal &
anr., reported in (2008) 17 SCC 491. This is the first ground on which I am
disinclined to grant any relief to the petitioners.
Meera Chauhan vs Harsh Bishnoi & Anr on 13 December, 2006
I also find support from the case of
Meera Chouhan V. Harsh Bishnoi, reported in (2007) 12 SCC 201, where the
Hon'ble Apex Court has laid down that powers under section 151 of the Civil
Procedure Code must be exercised only in exceptional circumstances for which
the Code lays down no procedure. Therefore, in my opinion, notwithstanding the
dismissal of the said petition, the application for introducing documents in the
stage of documents could not have been entertained by applying inherent power
of the Court under section 151 of the Code, for which exceptional circumstances
must exist and successfully demonstrated before the learned Trial Court.
1