Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.24 seconds)

Sri Swami Krishnanand Govindanand vs M.D. Oswal Hosiery (Regd.) on 20 February, 2002

12. The senior counsel for the respondent/review applicant has contended that the reply given by the counsel/senior counsel for the respondent to the queries raised by the Court during the hearing of the appeal, on the spur of the moment, cannot bind the respondent/review applicant particularly when the same relates to the factual/legal position and of which the counsel/senior counsel for the respondent was not expected to be aware, since the appeal was concerned only with the aspect of territorial jurisdiction of this Court. R.P. No.316/2014 in FAO(OS) No.144/2014 Page 5 of 15 Reliance in this regard is placed on Swami Krishnanand Govindanand Vs. M.D. Oswal Hosiery (Regd.) (2002) 3 SCC 39 in para 3 whereof it is observed that though there can be no doubt that admission of a party is a relevant material but the statement made by the counsel of a party across the Bar, cannot be treated as an admission.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 22 - Full Document

The Central Council For Research In ... vs Dr. K. Santhakumari on 4 May, 2001

13. The senior counsel for the respondent/review applicant has also referred to Central Council for Research in Ayurveda & Siddha Vs. Dr. K. Santhakumari (2001) 5 SCC 60 in para 13 whereof, referring to Uptron India Ltd. Vs. Shammi Bhan (1998) 6 SCC 538, it was held that a wrong concession on question of law made by a counsel is not binding on his client and such concession cannot constitute a just ground for a binding precedent.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 79 - Full Document

Uptron India Limited vs Shammi Bhan & Anr on 6 February, 1998

13. The senior counsel for the respondent/review applicant has also referred to Central Council for Research in Ayurveda & Siddha Vs. Dr. K. Santhakumari (2001) 5 SCC 60 in para 13 whereof, referring to Uptron India Ltd. Vs. Shammi Bhan (1998) 6 SCC 538, it was held that a wrong concession on question of law made by a counsel is not binding on his client and such concession cannot constitute a just ground for a binding precedent.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 280 - S S Ahmad - Full Document
1