Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.20 seconds)Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 4 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 306 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Harjit Singh And Ors. vs State Of Punjab on 16 August, 2002
Also
Hon'ble the Apex Court in the case of "Harjit Singh Vs.
State of Punjab" [2006(I) MPWN 125] that for
conviction of offence under Section 304-B of IPC, it is to be
16 Criminal Appeal No.1400/2010
established that cruelty or harassment relating to dowry
demand must have been done soon prior to death of the
deceased. In the present case, it could not be proved
beyond doubt that any demand of Rs.1.5 lakhs was made 15
days prior to the death of the deceased. Also there is no
allegation from the side of the witness Manish that in last
15 days of her lifetime, she made any complaint on mobile
phone about the dowry demand or harassment.
Section 32 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Shivkumar Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 3 November, 2014
In this context, the judgment
of this Court in the case of "Shivkumar Sharma Vs. State
of MP" [2010 (3) MPHT 418] may be perused, in which it
is held that if in last few days of her lifetime, no harassment
from the side of the accused persons is proved, then offence
under Section 304-B of IPC shall not be made out.
1