Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.30 seconds)

Hori Lal & Anr vs State Of U.P on 5 December, 2006

He then relied upon the judgment in Hori Lal v. State of Uttar Pradesh 1969 DGLS (SC) 323 wherein, it is observed that "It is contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that none of the injuries 2 to 6 which were inflicted on P.W. 2 discloses that there is a fracture or dislocation of any bone. These injuries, it is said, at the most show that the ::: Uploaded on - 18/04/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 16/06/2023 03:33:25 ::: 5 criapeal505.19 J particular bones on which the injuries were inflicted were cut which however does not amount to a fracture. It is true that fracture has not been defined in the Penal Code.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 43 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1