Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 23 (0.30 seconds)
Sunita Devi vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 31 January, 2017 cites

Ramayan Singh vs State Of Bihar And Anr. on 25 April, 2000

"9. The question raised by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, in our opinion, is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this Court in the case of Ramayan Singh (supra) and detention of the petitioner in the given case would not be illegal or without jurisdiction, as the learned Magistrate has not in specific words recorded that he took cognizance of the offence after filing of the charge sheet."
Patna High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 3 - A K Verma - Full Document

Tula Ram & Ors vs Kishore Singh on 5 October, 1977

20. As the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in the case of Raj Kishore Prasad (supra) categorically held that commitment of case to the Court of Session under Section 209 of the Code, would not be an inquiry as contemplated by Section 2 (g) of the Code, therefore, General provisions as to inquiries or trials provided under Chapter XXIV of the Code are not of any aid, in the proceedings of commitment of case to the Court of Session, in terms of Section 209 of the Code.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 273 - S M Ali - Full Document

State Of U.P vs Laxmi Brahman & Anr on 11 March, 1983

It appears that the view expressed in Lakshmi Brahaman case was not accepted by the Supreme Court in the case of Raj Kishore Prasad (supra),the Supreme Court held that the Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.937 of 2008 dt.31-01-2017 19/31 proceedings before the Magistrate at the stage of Section 209 (proceeding for commitment of the case to the court of Session)are not inquiry.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 102 - D A Desai - Full Document
1   2 3 Next