Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.20 seconds)Section 211 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
The Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960
The Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 2002
Section 2 in The Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
Ramniklal Amritlal Shah vs Bhupendra Impex Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. on 13 December, 2000
12. Learned counsel made an attempt to distinguish the
judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Ramniklal
Amritlal Shah (supra) on the ground that the application filed by the
applicant in Chamber Summons No.450 of 2015 cannot be considered
as interlocutory stage and thus the said judgment of the Division Bench
::: Uploaded on - 08/01/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 10/01/2019 22:40:15 :::
ppn 13 chs-424.15 wt 450.15 (j).d
of this Court in the case of Ramniklal Amritlal Shah (supra) would not
assist the case of the applicant in Chamber Summons No.450 of 2015.
He submits that in that case before the Division Bench of this Court,
none of the legal heirs had come forward for impleadment in place of
the original party.
The Hindu Succession Act, 1956
Surendra Chandra Jena And Ors. vs Laxminarayan Jena And Ors. on 17 November, 1987
27. Division Bench of this Court in the case of Ramesh Sippy
Vs.Suresh Gopaldas Sippy & Ors. (supra) has after adverting to the
judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Ramniklal
Amritlal Shah (supra) and several other judgments has allowed an
executor to proceed with the proceedings filed by the original testator
without obtaining probate at that stage and merely on the statement
made by the applicant that he would file a petition for probate within
one month from the date of the said order. The judgment of the Division
Bench would squarely apply to the facts of this case. I am respectfully
bound by the said judgment.
1