Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.33 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Scooter India Ltd. vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court And ... on 31 October, 1995
11. However, from the award it is clear that the labour court has given a finding of fact that the punishment was not disproportionate to the charge levelled against him as such the aforesaid cases of Rama Kant, Ved Prakash and Scooter India Limited (supra), are not applicable to the facts of the present case.
Dr Ramesh Chandra Tyagi vs Union Of India on 11 February, 1994
12. Relying on the case of Dr. Ramesh Chandra Tyagi v. U.O.I,, (1994) 2 SCC 416 ; B. C. Chaturvedi v. U.O.I., (1995) 6 SCC 749 ; Ram Kishan v. U.O.I., (1995) 6 SCC 157 ; U.P.S.R.T.C. v. Mahesh Kumar Misra, 2000 (2) AWC 1475 (SC) : 2000 (3) SCC 450 and Shiv Prakash Rai v. State of U. P., 2001 (3) UPLBEC 2222, he submits that even if plea of awarding lesser punishment is not taken before the High Court, it can still in exercise of power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India may interfere if it feels that the punishment is highly disproportionate to the charge/misconduct.
B.C. Chaturvedi vs Union Of India And Ors on 1 November, 1995
12. Relying on the case of Dr. Ramesh Chandra Tyagi v. U.O.I,, (1994) 2 SCC 416 ; B. C. Chaturvedi v. U.O.I., (1995) 6 SCC 749 ; Ram Kishan v. U.O.I., (1995) 6 SCC 157 ; U.P.S.R.T.C. v. Mahesh Kumar Misra, 2000 (2) AWC 1475 (SC) : 2000 (3) SCC 450 and Shiv Prakash Rai v. State of U. P., 2001 (3) UPLBEC 2222, he submits that even if plea of awarding lesser punishment is not taken before the High Court, it can still in exercise of power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India may interfere if it feels that the punishment is highly disproportionate to the charge/misconduct.
Ram Kishan vs Union Of India & Ors on 1 September, 1995
12. Relying on the case of Dr. Ramesh Chandra Tyagi v. U.O.I,, (1994) 2 SCC 416 ; B. C. Chaturvedi v. U.O.I., (1995) 6 SCC 749 ; Ram Kishan v. U.O.I., (1995) 6 SCC 157 ; U.P.S.R.T.C. v. Mahesh Kumar Misra, 2000 (2) AWC 1475 (SC) : 2000 (3) SCC 450 and Shiv Prakash Rai v. State of U. P., 2001 (3) UPLBEC 2222, he submits that even if plea of awarding lesser punishment is not taken before the High Court, it can still in exercise of power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India may interfere if it feels that the punishment is highly disproportionate to the charge/misconduct.
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation ... vs Mahesh Kumar Mishra And Ors on 15 March, 2000
12. Relying on the case of Dr. Ramesh Chandra Tyagi v. U.O.I,, (1994) 2 SCC 416 ; B. C. Chaturvedi v. U.O.I., (1995) 6 SCC 749 ; Ram Kishan v. U.O.I., (1995) 6 SCC 157 ; U.P.S.R.T.C. v. Mahesh Kumar Misra, 2000 (2) AWC 1475 (SC) : 2000 (3) SCC 450 and Shiv Prakash Rai v. State of U. P., 2001 (3) UPLBEC 2222, he submits that even if plea of awarding lesser punishment is not taken before the High Court, it can still in exercise of power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India may interfere if it feels that the punishment is highly disproportionate to the charge/misconduct.
Section 2A in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Rama Kant Misra vs State Of U.P. And Others on 21 October, 1982
In this regard he has placed reliance on Rama Kant Misra v. State of U. P., AIR 1982 SC 1552 ; Ved Prakash v. Delton Cable, AIR 1984 SC 914 and Scooter India Limited v. Labour Court, 1989 (1) SCJ 232.