Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.17 seconds)Workmen Of Dimakuchi Tea Estate vs The Management Of Dimakuchitea Estate on 4 February, 1958
D. Macropollo And Co. (Private) Ltd. vs D. Macropollo And Co. (Private) Ltd. ... on 18 August, 1958
and if it resulted in retrenchment that was inevitable.
These facts would show that in that case there was
reorganisation of the business resulting in retrenchment.
In the present case no such thing arises and the only
question for decision is whether the work which is perennial
and must go on from day to day and which is incidental and
necessary for the work of the refinery and which is
sufficient to employ a considerable number of wholetime
workmen and which is being done in most concerns through
regular workmen should be allowed to be done by contractors.
Considering the nature of the work and the conditions of
service in the present case we are of opinion that the
tribunal's decision is right and no interference is called
for, except that the date ;should now be changed, for such a
direction cannot be put into force with retrospective effect
from November 1, 1958. It appears that a few months remain
before the present contract will come to an end. We think
that for these few months the present system may continue.
We therefore dismiss the appeal with this modification that
the order of the tribunal will be carried into effect from
such date on which the present contract in force in the
company comes to an end. The respondents will get their
costs from the company.
Section 2 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
1