Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.24 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 19 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
S.I. Rooplal And Anr vs Lt. Governor Through Chief Secretary ... on 14 December, 1999
This
Court in the case of Tribhuvandas Purshottamdas Thakar v. Ratilal
Motilal Patel, [1968] 1 SCR 455 while dealing with a case in which
a Judge of the High Court had failed to follow the earlier judgment
KOMA KOMAL RANI
CAT Bangalore
L RANI2026.03.26
17:36:59+05'30'
26
OA No.170/00561/2023/CAT/BANGALORE
of a larger Bench of S.I. Rooplal And Anr vs Lt. Governor Through
Chief Secretary... on 14 December, 1999 the same court observed
thus:
P.M. Latha And Another vs State Of Kerala And Others on 5 March, 2003
(1) Judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.M. Latha and Another Vs.
State of Kerala and Others reported in (2003) 3 Supreme Court Cases
541 vide Civil Appeals Nos. 1726-28 of 2001 dated March 5, 2003:
Chief Manager Punjab National Bank vs Anit Kumar Das on 3 November, 2020
In Chief Manager, Punjab National Bank and another supra, the
Hon'ble Apex Court considering catena of judgments declared that
as held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in various decisions, it is for the
employer to determine and decide the relevancy and suitability of the
qualifications for any post and it is not for the Court to consider and
assess. A greater latitude is permitted by the Courts for the employer
to prescribe qualifications for any post. There is a rationale behind
it."
Tribhuvandas Purshottamdas Thakur vs Ratilal Motilal Patel on 5 September, 1967
Therefore, it has always been insisted that the decision of a
coordinate bench must be followed. (Vide: Tribhovandas
Purshottamdas Thakkar v. Ratilal Motilal Patel & Ors., AIR 1968 SC
372; Sub-Committee of Judicial Accountability v. Union of India &
Ors., (1992) 4 SCC 97; and State of Tripura v. Tripura Bar
Association & Ors., (1998) 5 SCC 637).
Union Of India & Others vs S. Vinodh Kumar & Others on 18 September, 2007
In Union of India v. S. Vinodh Kumar, (2007) 8
SCC 100 this Court held that :
Munindra Kumar And Ors. Etc vs Rajiv Govil And Ors Etc on 10 May, 1991
"18. It is also well settled that those candidates who had taken
part in the selection process knowing fully well the procedure
laid down therein were not entitled to question the same... (See
also Munindra Kumar v. Rajiv Govil, (1991) 3 SCC 368 and
Rashmi Mishra v. M.P. Public Service Commission, (2006) 12
SCC 724)."
Ku. Rashmi Mishra vs Madhya Pradesh Public Service ... on 19 October, 2006
"18. It is also well settled that those candidates who had taken
part in the selection process knowing fully well the procedure
laid down therein were not entitled to question the same... (See
also Munindra Kumar v. Rajiv Govil, (1991) 3 SCC 368 and
Rashmi Mishra v. M.P. Public Service Commission, (2006) 12
SCC 724)."