Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.35 seconds)Section 2A in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Chief Mining Engineer East India Coal ... vs Rameswar And Ors on 8 August, 1967
The aforesaid two decisions were referred by
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Chief Mining Engineer,
East India Coal Company Ltd., Vs. Rameswar reported
in AIR 1968 SC 218 and held that the right to the benefit
which is sought to be computed under Section 33-C(2)
3/15
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.21400 of 2015
must be an existing one, that is to say, already
adjudicated upon, or provided for
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis or must arise and 9 in the
course of and in relation to the relationship between the
industrial workmen and the employer.
Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Ganesh Razak & Anr. on 26 November, 1993
C(2) of the Act. Thus, by applying the ratio laid down by
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in all the aforesaid decisions,
this Court is of the view that the Labour Court was
justified in rejecting the petitioners' claim.
Everestee vs District Labour Officer on 10 June, 1999
In the case of Everestee Vs. District Labour Officer
reported in 1999 (3) LLN 678, a Hon'ble Division Bench
of the Kerala High Court had held that a person who has
opted for voluntary retirement, cannot be treated as
“workmen”.
A. Satyanarayana Reddy And Ors vs The Presiding Officer, Labour ... on 29 April, 2008
13. The ratio laid down in Satyanarayana Reddy's case
(supra), arise from the peculiar facts of that case, which
is clearly distinguishable from the facts of the case in
hand.
The Central Bank Of India Ltd vs P.S. Rajagopalan Etc on 19 April, 1963
In Central Bank of
India Vs. P.S.Rajagopalan reported in AIR 1964 SC
743, it was held that the power of the Labour Court
under Section 33-C(2) extends to interpretations of the
award or settlement on which the workmen's rights like
execution of Court's power to interpret the decree for the
purpose of execution, where the basis
is referable to the awards or settlements. However, it was
clarified that such powers of the Labour Court does not
extend to determine disputes of entitlement or the basis
of the claim, if there is no prior adjudication or
recognization of the same by the employer.
A.K. Bindal & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 25 April, 2003
In A.K.Bindal Vs. Union of India [2003 (5)
SCC 163], the two- Judge Bench has held that after
acceptance of the scheme and availing of benefits
under VRS an employee could not claim higher wages.